How a reasonable accommodation request can help with housing
Here are some of the ways that reasonable accommodations can help when you are applying to, or living in, public and subsidized housing in Massachusetts.
To learn what a reasonable accommodation is and what is considered a disability, see Reasonable Accommodations and Housing.
28. 760 C.M.R. § 5.05(1).
29. See related Giebeler v. M & B Associates, 343 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2003) (court held that the Fair Housing Amendments Act requires landlord to consider finances of co-signer where necessary to accommodate disabled tenant without sufficient income to rent apartment).
30. Tenant advocates have routinely claimed reasonable accommodation where a denial of housing is based on a criminal record (such as assault and battery) and the criminal activity was related to a disability. At least one federal court has held that a landlord did not need to provide an accommodation in the admissions context where a housing denial was based on a facially neutral policy denying applicants with a criminal record related to violent crime. Evans v. UDR, Inc., 2009 WL 1026724 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2009). But see Boston Hous. Auth. v. Bridgewaters, 452 Mass. 833 (2009) (tenant entitled to reasonable accommodation after receiving an eviction notice based on a physical assault); Roe v. Hous. Auth. of Boulder, 909 F. Supp. 814, 822-23 (D. Colo. 1995) (landlord could not lawfully evict a mentally ill tenant for violent behavior where landlord had not established that no accommodation would eliminate or acceptably minimize the risk to other tenants); Roe v. Sugar River Mills Assocs., 820 F. Supp. 636, 638-639 (D.N.H. 1993) (same). See Chapter 6: Tenant Screening, and Chapter 7: Challenging a Denial of Housing.
31. 24 C.F.R. § 982.204(c)(2); 24 C.F.R. § 960.202(c)(3).
32. 24 C.F.R. § 982.304.
33. Under federal law, a housing authority has a duty to “affirmatively further fair housing.” 42 U.S.C. § 3608(d). Some housing authorities have specifically included the requirement to freeze voucher search time in their Section 8 Administrative Plan.
34. In the current Section 8 voucher program, housing authorities can set a payment standard between 90%-110% of the fair market rent for its area. If the housing authority uses a payment standard below 110%, it may allow up to 110% for a person with disabilities who needs the adjustment as a reasonable accommodation. 24 C.F.R. § 982.503(b). If an individual needs a payment standard between 110% and 120% of fair market rent, the housing authority should make a request to the HUD local field office. 24 C.F.R. § 982.503(c)(2)(ii); 24 C.F.R. §982.505(d). If a payment standard in excess of 120% is necessary, a request may be forwarded to the Assistant Secretary of HUD at its central office in Washington, D.C. 24 C.F.R. §982.505(d). If the request is denied, a discrimination complaint may be filed with HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. See also 24 C.F.R. § 9.
35. 24 C.F.R. § 982.303(b)(2).
36. 24 C.F.R. § 982.517(e).
37. 24 C.F.R. § 982.402(b)(8).
38. 24 C.F.R. § 982.306(d).
39. 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (f)(3)(A); 24 C.F.R. § 100.203; G.L. c. 151B, § 4(7A).
40. 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(A); 24 C.F.R. § 100.203; G.L. c. 151B, § 4(7A)(1).
41. Although a housing provider must pay for reasonable modifications in buildings of ten or more units, a housing provider need not pay for installing a ramp to more than five steps or installing a wheelchair lift. Reasonable modifications include, but are not limited to, making housing accessible to mobility-impaired, hearing-impaired and sight-impaired persons, installing a doorbell that flashes, lowering a cabinet, ramping a front entrance of five or fewer vertical steps, widening a doorway, and installing a grab bar. G.L. c. 151B, § 4(7A)(3).
42. 24 C.F.R. § 100.203; HUD Multifamily Occupancy Handbook 4350.3, §§ 2.46, 2.8, REV-1, CHG-4 (November 2013); G.L. c. 151B, § 4(7A).
43. See Assessing a Person’s Request to Have an Animal as a Reasonable Accommodation Under the Fair Housing Act, FHEO-2020-01.
44. See 73 Federal Register 63834 (Oct. 27, 2008); HUD Public Housing Occupancy Guidebook, § 16.1; HUD Multifamily Occupancy Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, CHG-3 (June 2009), §2-44.
45. 760 C.M.R. § 6.03.
46. 24 C.F.R. §5.303(a); 73 Federal Register 63834 (Oct. 27, 2008); HUD Multifamily Occupancy Handbook 4350.3 REV-1, CHG-3 (June 2009), § 2-44.
47. See Joint Statement of the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Justice entitled “Reasonable Accommodations Under the Fair Housing Act,” May 17, 2004, p. 6, ex. 1; see also Jankowski Lee & Assocs. v. Cisneros, 91 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 1996).
48. 42 U.S.C. § 3610; G.L. 151B, §§ 3, 5, 6, and 8; 804 C.M.R. §§ 1.00 et seq.
49. 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c)(1); Heights Cmty. Cong. v. Hilltop Realty, Inc., 774 F.2d 135 (6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1019 (1986) (allowing injunctive relief); Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976); Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968); Moore v. Townsend, 525 F.2d 482 (7th Cir. 1975); Smith v. Sol D. Adler Realty Co., 436 F.2d 344 (7th Cir. 1970); G.L. c. 151B, § 9 (statutory basis for injunctive relief); G.L. c. 93, § 102(b); G.L. c. 12, §§ 11H and 11I.
50. See Whittier Terrace Assocs. v. Hampshire, 26 Mass. App. Ct. 1020 (1989); Bhogaita v. Altamonte Heights Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 765 F.3d 1277, 1288-89 (11th Cir. 2014) (finding that plaintiff established his need for emotional assistance animal was a reasonable accommodation because it alleviated symptoms of his disability).
51. See City Wide Assocs. v. Penfield, 409 Mass. 140 (1991) (tenant who threw water on the walls and hit walls with a bat due to auditory hallucinations related to her mental illness entitled to reasonable accommodation).
52. See Schuett Inv. Co. v. Anderson, 386 N.W.2d 249 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986) (requiring affirmative steps to accommodate disabled tenants and remedy code violations).
53. For Personal Care Worker eligibility criteria, see 130 C.M.R. § 403.423.
54. 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(9).
55. Wirtz Realty Corp. v. Freund, 308 Ill. App. 3d 866, 875-876 (1999); Howard v. City of Beavercreek, 108 F. Supp. 2d 866, 875 (S.D. Ohio 2000).
56. See Boston Hous. Auth. v. Bridgewaters, 452 Mass. 833 (2009); Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp., 884 A.2d 1109 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Roe v. Sugar River Mills Assocs., 820 F. Supp. 636 (D.N.H. 1993); Roe v. Hous. Auth. of Boulder, 909 F. Supp. 814 (D. Colo. 1995); see also Joint Statement of the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Justice, “Reasonable Accommodations Under the Fair Housing Act,” May 17, 2004, pp. 4-6.