Your Right to a Grievance
Notas finales
This section explains the grievance process and how it came to be a protected right.
If the housing authority uses a private management company for day-to-day operations at a development, the actions of the private management company would also be grievable.
Such an action would violate state anti-retaliation laws. See M.G.L. c. 186, § 18, and M.G.L. c. 239, § 2A.
National Housing Law Project, HUD Housing Programs: Tenants’ Rights (5 th Ed. 2018), Section 10.2.1.2. The lawsuit was Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S 254 (1970).
760 C.M.R. § 4.02(2).
HUD, Public Housing Agency (PHA) Plan Desk Guide (2001); Form HUD-50075-ST, Instructions, A1 (HUD encourages PHAs to post Plans on their websites).
For the state grievance laws, see 760 C.M.R. § 6.08 and M.G.L. c. 121B, § 32. For the federal grievance laws, see 24 C.F.R. § 966, Subpart B, and 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(k). In some instances, DHCD and HUD may permit a housing authority to use a similar grievance procedure for most or all of their sites. In the past, the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), the state agency that oversees state public housing, said that its grievance regulations applied to both state and federal public housing. See Commissioner of Department of Community Affairs v. Medford Housing Authority, 363 Mass. 826, 298 N.E.2d 862 (1973), and Harborview Residents’ Committee, Inc. v. Quincy Housing Authority, 368 Mass. 425, 332 N.E.2d 891 (1975). This is no longer DHCD’s position. See 760 C.M.R. § 6.02(1) (760 C.M.R. § 6.00 applies to persons residing in state-aided public housing).
For federal public housing, see 24 C.F.R. § 966.4(e)(8). For state public housing, see 760 C.M.R. § 6.06(4)(j).
See Saxton v. Housing Authority of the City of Tacoma, 1 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 1993) which held that a public housing tenant whose request to add a returning family member to a lease was denied has a right to a grievance hearing pursuant to 24 C.F.R. § 966.50.
See 24 C.F.R. § 8.53(b) (denial of reasonable accommodation subject to grievance rights). Given the often-sensitive medical information and/or lack of expertise of non health care persons, the Cambridge Housing Authority has a separate procedure for denials of reasonable accommodations.
Some grievance procedures may allow a late grievance for good cause shown.
Such an action would violate state anti-retaliation laws. See M.G.L. c. 186, § 18, and M.G.L. c. 239, § 2A.
760 C.M.R. § 6.06(8)(b), and 24 C.F.R. § 966.4(e)(8)(ii)(B), (l)(3)(iv). See also Cambridge Housing Authority v. Wedge, 2000 Mass. App. Div. 235 (2000) (eviction dismissed where grievance procedure not concluded at time housing authority filed action).