If you feel that the landlord's proposed rent increase is unreasonable or illegal and you want to keep your apartment, there are a number of ways you may be able to challenge or negotiate the proposed rent increase.
a. Make a Counter Offer
While landlords are not legally required to negotiate with tenants, you may be able to convince your landlord to reconsider or lower the amount of the increase. Make a counter offer. If you have a good relationship with the landlord, she may want to keep you as a tenant. Or ask the landlord to reconsider the increase because repairs are needed, or hold off on the increase at least until the repairs are made.
b. Join with Other Tenants to Fight the Increase
Tenants in buildings facing rent increases have successfully worked together to negotiate agreements with their landlords that keep rents affordable and get repairs made.
As a tenant, you have important legal rights and you can strengthen your bargaining position by joining with other people in your building or other tenants who have the same landlord and are facing similar problems. If you suspect you are facing a rent increase as part of your landlord’s plan to empty your building, the best way to protect yourself and other tenants may be by starting or joining a tenant group. Remember – it is illegal for a landlord to retaliate against you for starting or joining a tenant group.
As part of a tenant group, you can learn together about your legal rights and organizing strategies, research who really owns and controls your building, get support from tenant advocacy organizations and elected officials, and use your collective power to negotiate with the landlord for fair rents and better conditions.
c. Recent Examples of Successful Tenant Collective Bargaining
Tenant groups in Massachusetts are successfully persuading landlords to reconsider steep rent increases, building clear-outs and condominium conversions by negotiating “collective bargaining agreements.” Here are some examples.
Same Corporate Landlord in Different Communities
In 2014-2015, a diverse group of tenants in separate buildings in Chelsea, Dorchester, East Boston, Mattapan, Roxbury, and South Boston learned that their properties were owned by the same real estate investment corporation. Each property had between 3-10 units and had been acquired under different corporate names. After the change in ownership, all of the tenants were hit with unaffordable rent increases and eviction notices. The tenants joined City Life Vida Urbana and the Chinese Progressive Association (two bilingual tenant rights organizations) and learned that although their buildings were each bought under different corporate names, they were all managed by one management company and funded and controlled by the same few investors.
With support from City Life Vida Urbana and Chinese Progressive Association, the tenants organized and launched an aggressive publicity campaign, highlighting the management company’s unfair business practices and the mass displacement their practices were causing, which was mostly hurting families of color. Facing sustained pressure from the tenant associations, litigation costs in eviction cases defended by legal services, and mounting community resistance against their property development proposals, the real estate investment group agreed to negotiate.
Public officials stepped up to facilitate the negotiations. Represented by Greater Boston Legal Services attorneys, the two tenant groups successfully negotiated agreements with fair rents, fair treatment, repairs, and long term leases including:
- All tenants being evicted for a reason that was not their fault would get 4-year leases starting at their existing rents, with a 3% cap on each yearly rent increase; and
- All (hundreds) of the management company’s Section 8 voucher tenants would have rents with utility allowances that did not exceed 30% of the tenants’ adjusted income.
Small Tenant Groups
In 2014, four households in a single building in Mattapan joined City Life Vida Urbana after being hit with steep rent increases and eviction notices. The tenants organized into a small tenant association, and with the on-going support of City Life Vida Urbana, the association generated political pressure and publicity about their situation. With legal representation by the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, the tenant association successfully negotiated housing solutions that met the different needs of each household including:
- For three households, a 3-5-year lease, depending on the household’s initial affordable rent, with a 5% cap on any yearly rent increases.
- For one household that needed to relocate, a 1.5 year occupancy agreement with no rent increase.
For more about how to challenge unfair rent increases, see Chapter 10: Getting Organized - Unfair Rent Increases and Displacement.