Fighting an eviction in court
This section walks you through the steps of fighting an eviction in court.
Endnotes
64 . The rules for eviction cases in court are the Uniform Summary Process Rules (U.S.P.R.).
65 . U.S.P.R. 2(c) specifies Thursdays as the day for summary process cases, but some courts also schedule summary process cases for other days of the week. Other days may also be used for eviction cases. Check with your court.
66 . U.S.P.R. 2(d). The reason should be stated in the complaint form following the words "unlawfully and against the right of said landlord/owner because." Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See also the commentary to U.S.P.R. 2(d).
68 . Mass. R. Civ. P. 4(c); U.S.P.R. 2(b). See also G.L. c. 220, §7.
69 . See G.L. c. 223, §31; U.S.P.R. 2(b).
70 . U.S.P.R. 2(b).
71 . Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5); Inhabitants of Brewer v. Inhabitants of New Gloucester, 14 Mass. 216 (1817); Hart v. Huckins, 6 Mass. 399 (1810). In fact, it is a crime to impersonate a constable, sheriff, or other authority. G.L. c. 268, §33. It might be worthwhile to check whether the constable's license has expired.
72 . Whether a lease or a tenancy-at-will is involved, the grounds for eviction must be supported by the prior notice to quit. See, e.g., Everett v. Daily, Boston Housing Court, No. 15-SP-2205 (Muirhead, J., June 17, 2015) (dismissal of case where the landlord claims a lease violation on the notice to quit but then relies on a summons and compliant that simply states that the tenant has not vacated after the expiration of the notice to quit); Pine Grove Vill., Inc. v. Cardullo, 2001 Mass. App. Div. 234 (2001) (incumbent on owner to establish that tenant committed the violations that were specifically identified and alleged in the notice to quit); Charles v. Senatus, Boston Housing Court, No. 11-SP-838 (Muirhead, J., Mar. 21, 2011) (inconsistent grounds in notice to quit and complaint); Glover v. Blendman, Boston Housing Court No. 99-SP-02315 (Winik, J., June 1, 1999) (where landlord originally served 14 day notice for nonpayment but summons referenced only late payment and illegal conduct and did not provide rental period notice, action could not proceed); Kahaly v. Sinke, Roxbury Dist. Court Summary Process No. 12164 (Martin, J., Nov. 25, 1987) (where landlord sent 14 day notice to quit for nonpayment but alleged both tenant fault and nonpayment in complaint, claims of fault barred because no rental period notice to quit sent).
73 . The complaint may include a claim for unpaid rent/use and occupancy. See G.L. c. 239, §§ 2–3. Other items that are not rent (such as the unpaid portion of a security deposit, late fees, or costs for removal or replacement of property) cannot be included. See Patti v. White, Boston Housing Court, No. 11-SP-2116 (Pierce, C.J., Dec. 27, 2011) (costs of missing trash containers and removal of personal property stricken); Deep v. Tremblay, Western Housing Court, No. 10-SP-4716 (Fields, J., Apr. 15, 2011) upheld without addressing specific issue, 81 Mass. App. Ct. 1131 (2012, Rule 1:28) (late fees); Alzamora v. Voguenel, Boston Housing Court No. 06-SP-3517 (Edwards, J., Nov. 15, 2006); Miguel v. Veenstra, Southeast Housing Court, No. 05 SP-3364 (Edwards, J., Dec. 9, 2005); Hackett v. Smith, Boston Housing Court, No. 14-SP-1109 (Muirhead, J., Apr. 11, 2014) (mailbox replacement and additional water usage). G.L. c. 239, §§ 2–3 makes no provision for recovery of attorney’s fees in a summary process action. See Avalon Bay Comm. Inc. v. Thomas, Boston Housing Court No. 09-SP-2755 (Muirhead, J., Feb. 15, 2012) (rejecting a motion for attorney’s fees because attorney’s fees are not provided for in §§2–3, and because the fees were not listed in the complaint and the complaint was not amended).
74 . Late filing is not permitted without the written assent of the defendant or the defendant's attorney. U.S.P.R. 2(e). See also District Court Bulletin, 2-89 (May 12, 1989). Note that Mass. R. Civ. P. 77(c), which requires clerks to file any papers offered, is inconsistent with U.S.P.R. 2 and therefore does not apply to summary process actions. U.S.P.R. 1.
75 . Spearhead Capital v. Rosado-Craig, Boston Housing Court, No. 14-SP-4420 (Muirhead, J., Nov. 24, 2014); Saxon Mortgage v. Johnson, Boston Housing Court, No. 08-SP-319 ((Winik, J., Feb. 15, 2008).
77 . U.S.P.R. 2(d).
78 . U.S.P.R. 3 requires that the answer date be the Monday after the entry date. Note that filing by mail is not complete until it is received. Courts also have the discretion to allow the late filing of answers, as allowed in U.S.P.R. 10(a) and otherwise. Under U.S.P.R. 3, answer forms must be made available from the court.
79 . As described in U.S.P.R. 2(c), the trial is scheduled for the second Thursday after the entry date (although courts are permitted to schedule trials for other days as well).
80 . U.S.P.R. 7(b).
81 . Mass. R. Civ. P. 40. You may also file with the court a written motion for a continuance requesting that the trial be postponed. You should include an affidavit (sworn statement) stating the reasons for the postponement. If you are unable to obtain a continuance and you are "defaulted," you should file a motion to remove the default.
82 . G.L. c. 185C, §20. Housing courts have full equitable powers and the same powers as a superior court. Although district courts generally do not have equitable powers, they are given full equitable powers in summary process cases. G.L. c. 218, §19; G.L. c. 185C, §3. In housing court, you have a right to a jury trial. U.S.P.R. 8. A jury trial must be requested when the transfer form is filed.
83 . See generally G.L. c. 185C.
84 . U.S.P.R. 4. If the case has been postponed for 2 weeks in the district court because discovery was filed, the case can still be transferred the day before the rescheduled trial date.
85 . U.S.P.R. 4 requires that the case be scheduled "forthwith." In practice, the transfer may add 2 weeks or more of delay. Check with your local housing court to see whether your case will be rescheduled.
87 . The answer form included at the end of this book is generally more useful than the form supplied by the court because it includes all of the most commonly used defenses and counterclaims and has complete instructions for its use.
88 . If the court fails to notice the jury demand and neither party brings it to the court’s attention until after the trial is completed or significantly underway, it may be deemed waived. See, e.g., Sicard v. Haley, Boston Housing Court, No. 09-SP-1393 (Muirhead, J., May 19, 2009).
89 . Where ongoing rent is not being paid or there is a significant arrearage, a landlord may request that the court enter an order that rent in arrears be escrowed or paid into court and that the tenant be required to pay for current use and occupancy pending the jury trial. If such an order is entered and the tenant does not comply, the court may order that the right to jury trial is waived. See Chandler v. Johnson, 78 Mass. App. Ct. 1120 (2011) (Rule 1:28 opinion; text available at 2011 WL 103596); Wingate Mgmt. v. Taranov, Boston Housing Court, No. 08-SP-4466 (Muirhead, J., Feb. 20, 2009); Cushing Constr. Mgmt. v. Weiner, Boston Housing Court, No. 06-SP-4201 (Edwards, J., Dec. 21, 2006).
90 . Conditions of disrepair in the property may be considered in establishing the fair rental value. See Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Young, Boston Housing Court, No. 12-SP-3801 (Winik, J., Oct. 4, 2013).
92 . U.S.P.R. 10(a).
93 . U.S.P.R. 10(c).
94 . U.S.P.R. 10(e).
95 . U.S.P.R. 10(b).
97 . U.S.P.R. 7.
98 . U.S.P.R. 7(b).
99 . U.S.P.R. 7(c). Note that if discovery is being objected to, the motion for a protective order must be filed within 5 days of the discovery request.
100 . U.S.P.R. 7(d).
101 . U.S.P.R. 7(e).
102 . A report so signed is admissible in evidence without the need to have the inspector present, and is prima facie evidence that the conditions stated in the report exist. G.L. c. 239, §8A. The Board of Health is required to provide this certification on every inspection report. 105 C.M.R. §410.821(A)(8). Note that where a landlord fails to appeal an order of the Board of Health under the administrative appeal process set forth by the state Sanitary Code, the Board's decision becomes final and the landlord is barred from collaterally attacking the decision in a subsequent court action. Lezberg v. Rogers, 27 Mass. App. Ct. 1158 (1989).
103 . Try to state these questions in a way that would require your landlord to answer in short (preferably "yes" or "no") answers that are helpful to your case. For example, if you are claiming that your landlord is evicting you because you called the Board of Health, you might want to ask (among other things): "You didn't start this eviction until after I called the Board of Health, did you?" rather than "Why are you evicting me?"
104 . You may require people to appear, testify, and bring evidence to court by using a subpoena. Mass. R. Civ. P. 45. Anyone can serve a subpoena, but you must serve it according to state law. You can also have a constable serve a subpoena and seek court payment of the cost if you think you may qualify for low-income assistance by filing an Affidavit of Indigency (Booklet 9).
105 . The Housing Court can grant equitable relief to enforce the State Sanitary Code prior to trial. Ciancio v. Ciancio, Boston Housing Court, No. 15-SP-1555 (Dalton, J., May 7, 2015).
106 . G.L. c. 233, §23C. See also Supreme Judicial Court Rules, Rule 1:18 Uniform Rules on Dispute Resolution, adopted May 1, 1998, Rule 9(h), about confidentiality.
107 . Supreme Judicial Court Rules, Rule 1:18 Uniform Rules on Dispute Resolution, adopted May 1, 1998, Rule 6(i), provides that "[i]n dispute intervention, in cases in which one or more of the parties is not represented by counsel, a neutral [mediator, housing specialist, clerk magistrate] has a responsibility, while maintaining impartiality, to raise questions for the parties to consider as to whether they have the information needed to reach a fair and fully informed settlement of the case."
108 . Boston Hous. Auth. v. Cassio, 428 Mass. 112 (1998); Thibbitts v. Crowley, 405 Mass. 222 (1989); but see J.M. Realty Mgmt. v. Espino, Boston Housing Court, No. 12-SP-4921 (Pierce, C.J., Mar. 13, 2013) (court vacated an agreement where it found that there was no consideration and the tenant gained nothing in exchange for agreeing to move out).
109 . If you have filed a motion to dismiss that is to be heard on the trial date, you should remind the judge of this. Since this is a "pre-trial" motion, it would be heard before the landlord begins her case. Also, since you would be the "moving party," you would speak first.